| 发布于: | 雪球 | 回复：48 | 喜欢：102 |
查了一下原文，这一段是他在慕尼黑安全会议期间跟德国和意大利外长出席论坛时的开场白，强调基于自愿的同盟关系和多边国际合作的重要性：From the start of this administration, we’ve made an investment, a reinvestment, in our alliances, in our partnerships, and in the multilateral system. We’ve reinvested, we’ve re-engaged, we’ve tried to rejuvenate, we’ve even reimagined. And the reason for that is simple: it’s because it’s in our interest to do it. Not a single one of the challenges that we have to face and that are so important to the interests of the American people can we effectively deal with alone, as powerful and as resourceful as we are. And so across the board, we’ve seen our comparative advantage as having a strong network of voluntary alliances, voluntary partnerships. And if you’re not at the table in the international system, you’re going to be on the menu. So it was very important for us to re-engage multilaterally, and we’ve done that.
布林肯是从巴黎文化人里混出来的，他爸妈那一代就混欧洲的外交圈子，不管怎么说还是体面人。
目前网上流传的断章取义来自俄国卫星通讯社，原文参见State dept的官网网页链接
bingo! @陈达美股投资 达子根本搞不懂社达(斯宾塞主义)和马基雅维利主义的差别。布林肯说了当下国际关系的现实。所以，同理念国家不结盟，就会变成别人的鱼肉。坐看美股暴跌，让达子哭泣。#中美关系# #中美贸易战# #美股# $纳斯达克综合指数(.IXIC)$ $纳斯达克100指数(.NDX)$
这与成熟与幼稚没有一毛钱关系。国与国的关系不是两个朋友之间相处，“你有这种想法好幼稚，我好成熟”这种想法本身是比较幼稚的。
难道尼克松访后，关系解冻是美丽国要带领我们脱贫致富吗？
嗨反正大家来雪球也不是搞严肃讨论的。
btw，社达从来是个ill-defined的概念：究竟是以什么为单位的竞争（个体、国家、种族还是啥）？究竟是以什么标准来竞争（繁衍数量、存续时间、权势财富还是啥）？以及最重要的，究竟是“弱肉强食”，还是“适者生存”（弱者也可以适，强者也可以不适）；究竟是一个往回看的解释性理论还是一个往前看的规范性理论……