发布于: iPhone转发:140回复:309喜欢:121

强烈谴责美国联邦储备体系!

   今天FT文章:世界上最大的对冲基金之一,Baupost’s Seth Klarman 管着300多亿美元。他过去一年跑输了大势。因为他是一个价值投资者。他在给投资者的信中,强烈谴责美国联邦储备银行。过去一年的货币政策是:无限制的货币供给、信贷供给、利率超低。并且用中央银行来买企业债券。这严重地破坏了市场的纪律,导致了市场对风险失去感觉;垃圾往天上飞,概念满天飞。而且严重加剧了贫富悬殊。劳动人民继续往下沉,失业和沾不到资产价格膨胀的任何好处,而有钱人和有资产的人占尽了资产价格膨胀的好处,鸡犬升天。

Seth Klarman, founder of the hedge fund Baupost Group, told clients central bank policies and government stimulus measures convinced investors that the risk was “simply gone,” leaving the market unable to meet. its role as a price discovery mechanism.

His fund’s private letter to investors, which was seen by the Financial Times, amounts to a damning criticism of recent market behavior by one of the world’s leading value investors.

Mr. Klarman criticized the Federal Reserve for cutting rates and flooding the financial system with money since the onset of the coronavirus pandemic, arguing that the central bank’s measures have made it difficult to assess the health of the U.S. economy.

“With so much stimulus on the table, trying to determine if the economy is in a recession is like trying to assess if you had a fever after taking a high dose of aspirin,” he wrote. “But like the frogs in water that slowly heats up to a boil, investors are conditioned not to recognize the danger.”

The biggest problem with these unprecedented and sustained government and central bank interventions is that the risks to capital become masked even as they increase.

U.S. stocks have risen more than 75% since their March lows, while corporate debt spreads – a measure of how much additional interest corporate borrowers have to pay relative to the U.S. government – have returned to pre-Covid levels this month. 

Mr. Klarman – who founded Baupost in Boston nearly four decades ago and raised it to $ 30 billion in assets under management – underperformed the market in 2020.

For several months he has been intensifying his criticisms of the interventions of American central banks. In the last quarterly letter, Mr. Klarman called the Fed the “800 pound gorilla” that has ousted investors who typically provide liquidity in times of distress.

“The biggest problem with these unprecedented and sustained government and central bank interventions is that the risks to capital become masked even as they increase,” he said.

Mr. Klarman also said that the Fed’s policies had exacerbated economic inequalities, referring to a “K” shaped recovery which has seen “the fortunes of those already at the top leap rapidly upwards, while those at the bottom remain on an endless downward slope.”

Taking Tesla as an example, Mr Klarman said shares of the “barely profitable” electric automaker had skyrocketed “seemingly beyond all reason,” briefly making company founder Elon Musk the richest person in the world. Low interest rates have made projected cash flow more valuable, he said, a point many investors have recklessly used to justify valuations of companies that are well above historical norms.

“The further away the end result, the more the current value increases,” he wrote. “When it comes to the value of cash flow, the vast and unlimited future, which has yet to be revealed, has gained ground in a more firmly entrenched present.”

The Fed’s policies and programs “have directly contributed to exceptionally benign market conditions where almost everything is up while downside volatility is truncated,” he added. “The usual role of the market in price discovery has effectively been suspended.”

Mr. Klarman said investors were now in a constant search for yield that took them to riskier corners of the markets, including investment grade corporate debt, private credit or junk bonds.

The Fed’s drastic measures have helped boost economic activity and save struggling businesses, Klarman said. “But they also sparked two dangerous ideas: that budget deficits don’t matter and that no matter how much debt is overdue, we can effortlessly, safely and reliably accumulate more. “

精彩讨论

横槊2021-01-21 18:39

虽然作为一个股民受益于货币放水,但是我也同意Klarman的谴责,货币放水的确加大了贫富差距。

查拉图斯特拉如是说2021-01-21 18:45

我非常赞同这个提法。是的,全世界由于疫情,无节制滥发货币,导致货币过剩。这种情况下,本来应该是通货膨胀。但是经济学没有注意到通货膨胀的对象其实是有区分的。工资在现在这么困难的情况下,企业不裁人已经不错了,好想涨工资是不可能的。由于工资不涨,生活必需品也没有办法涨,要不然你东西卖不掉。但是货币又滥发了那么多,必然要找去处。最好的就是股市,楼市,艺术品市场。去年美国澳大利亚这么惨经济基本面下,楼市居然是涨得。艺术品市场我关注少,但我估计是涨得,但这部分资金池不大,对吸收过多资金效用估计不大。
资金最大的去处就是证券市场。那些概念股,所谓的白马股,在基金抱团这样的操作下,创造了一个又一个新高。资金已经不理会企业的价值了。股息是无所谓的,关键看增长预期。所以银行股公用事业股就很惨。因为业绩死水一滩,你钱赚得多,现金流好,股息分的多没有用,你没增长,就没有未来预期。所以现在出现了奇葩。特斯拉蔚来,这样的公司根本连盈利都成问题,卖一辆车亏一辆,靠资本市场补贴业绩增长,无所谓亏损,亏的越多越光荣,。这样企业被解读成未来的方向。宁德时代虽然是不错的企业,但是充其量也就是电动车的一个供应商而已,现在宁德时代估值已经等于上汽加通用加福特。换句话说,宁德时代以前只是一个福建三线城市小屌丝,现在变阔了,变成中国美国所有最大汽车制造商市值总和。你觉得这市值,这估值奇怪吗?海天味业市值超过了中石化。中国第一的卖酱油的企业超过了中国第一的卖石油的企业。
我知道有人肯定会笑我过时。我只能讲一个故事。2015年搜房网市值超过了恒大。当时财经媒体还讨论了这个事。觉得这是互联网思维的胜利,新经济的房地产互联网服务公司战胜腐朽没落的房地产公司,是创新的胜利。可是呢,回头看看。搜房变成了房天下,市值只是恒大的零头的零头了。往事并不如烟啊!

心定则神闲2021-01-21 18:36

看来绝大部分人都忘记了真正的财富是怎样创造出来的,都想永远舒适的躺在资本盛宴当中不愿意起来了!

资本主义拉美行不通2021-01-22 02:39

我完全不同意这个说法,放水发钱通货膨胀或许加大了贫富差距,但这一切都是必要的。
举个例子,我有200块钱,某富豪有400亿元。这个时候,国家决定给每人发4000元。这样一来,因为国家决定刺激经济,所以富豪的公司股价上涨了,富豪变成有1000亿元,而我有4200元了,贫富差距更大了。
但是实际上,反对的人没有弄明白,人每天都要吃饭,而不能等到“长远的时候”再吃饭。我只有200元了,因为疫情不能工作,200元用完就要上街乞讨了。这样的人在美国非常多,如果不发钱,导致饿死的人数比新冠的人数多那就成了天大的笑话(胡佛就是这么想的)。
这些对冲基金经理衣食无忧,根本不知道底层失业群众的难处,动辄进行一些不切实际的批判是很不对的。

i知府2021-01-22 08:15

社会根本不需要担心富人有多富,社会最应该担心的是穷人有没有得到基本保障.......

全部讨论

2021-01-21 18:39

虽然作为一个股民受益于货币放水,但是我也同意Klarman的谴责,货币放水的确加大了贫富差距。

我非常赞同这个提法。是的,全世界由于疫情,无节制滥发货币,导致货币过剩。这种情况下,本来应该是通货膨胀。但是经济学没有注意到通货膨胀的对象其实是有区分的。工资在现在这么困难的情况下,企业不裁人已经不错了,好想涨工资是不可能的。由于工资不涨,生活必需品也没有办法涨,要不然你东西卖不掉。但是货币又滥发了那么多,必然要找去处。最好的就是股市,楼市,艺术品市场。去年美国澳大利亚这么惨经济基本面下,楼市居然是涨得。艺术品市场我关注少,但我估计是涨得,但这部分资金池不大,对吸收过多资金效用估计不大。
资金最大的去处就是证券市场。那些概念股,所谓的白马股,在基金抱团这样的操作下,创造了一个又一个新高。资金已经不理会企业的价值了。股息是无所谓的,关键看增长预期。所以银行股公用事业股就很惨。因为业绩死水一滩,你钱赚得多,现金流好,股息分的多没有用,你没增长,就没有未来预期。所以现在出现了奇葩。特斯拉蔚来,这样的公司根本连盈利都成问题,卖一辆车亏一辆,靠资本市场补贴业绩增长,无所谓亏损,亏的越多越光荣,。这样企业被解读成未来的方向。宁德时代虽然是不错的企业,但是充其量也就是电动车的一个供应商而已,现在宁德时代估值已经等于上汽加通用加福特。换句话说,宁德时代以前只是一个福建三线城市小屌丝,现在变阔了,变成中国美国所有最大汽车制造商市值总和。你觉得这市值,这估值奇怪吗?海天味业市值超过了中石化。中国第一的卖酱油的企业超过了中国第一的卖石油的企业。
我知道有人肯定会笑我过时。我只能讲一个故事。2015年搜房网市值超过了恒大。当时财经媒体还讨论了这个事。觉得这是互联网思维的胜利,新经济的房地产互联网服务公司战胜腐朽没落的房地产公司,是创新的胜利。可是呢,回头看看。搜房变成了房天下,市值只是恒大的零头的零头了。往事并不如烟啊!

看来绝大部分人都忘记了真正的财富是怎样创造出来的,都想永远舒适的躺在资本盛宴当中不愿意起来了!

我完全不同意这个说法,放水发钱通货膨胀或许加大了贫富差距,但这一切都是必要的。
举个例子,我有200块钱,某富豪有400亿元。这个时候,国家决定给每人发4000元。这样一来,因为国家决定刺激经济,所以富豪的公司股价上涨了,富豪变成有1000亿元,而我有4200元了,贫富差距更大了。
但是实际上,反对的人没有弄明白,人每天都要吃饭,而不能等到“长远的时候”再吃饭。我只有200元了,因为疫情不能工作,200元用完就要上街乞讨了。这样的人在美国非常多,如果不发钱,导致饿死的人数比新冠的人数多那就成了天大的笑话(胡佛就是这么想的)。
这些对冲基金经理衣食无忧,根本不知道底层失业群众的难处,动辄进行一些不切实际的批判是很不对的。

2021-01-21 18:22

看评论就知道中国有些人在资本主义路上越走越远了

2021-01-21 18:19

自己踏空,就为民代言?卢瑟基金。

考不及格的学生怪出题的?
从资本历史概率来说,国债违约都是一件非小概率事件,美联储远远没有越线。合格的基金经理需要一个走在政策之前的脑袋。难道不是么

这是著名《安全边际》一书作者塞斯卡尔曼,跑输就骂,给价投丢脸了。

2021-01-21 23:44

不放水 所有商業都要倒閉 .... 公司倒閉了 又拿什麼發給勞動者呢 .....美聯儲做的完全沒問題 現在最大的風險 就是過早的停止放水和救助

2021-01-22 00:12

按人头放水,居然会加剧贫富分化。。。啧啧啧。。