经济与投资研究|W221126|死神的。。。。。。

发布于: 雪球转发:0回复:0喜欢:0

    

《吾布斯言》

WeComment.ORG 

因众所周知的原因,以下内容仅为本期不完整正文。查看全文请访问网站 WeComment.ORG 相同标题的文章页面

《货币的非国家化》

中英双语【连载】

比乌托邦的欧洲货币更现实的建议

我认为,这一方案要比创建一种新的欧洲货币的乌托邦方案更为可欲、也更为可行,欧洲货币方案最终的结果只能是使所有货币灾难的起因和根源——政府垄断货币之发行和控制——更为顽固。假如这些国家确实不准备采用上面提出的更为有限的建议,那按理他们更难接受某种欧洲共同货币。完全剥夺政府所拥有之货币垄断权的想法,确实有点过于突兀,如果在不远的将来就采行此方案,大多数人甚至会有点惊恐。不过,只要从一开始,允许各国政府发行之货币为讨好公众而展开竞争,则人们是会逐渐了解此种方案之优势的。

A more realistic proposal than a utopian European currency

I believe that this proposal is more desirable and feasible than the utopian proposal to create a new European currency, which would only end up making the cause and root cause of all monetary disasters - the government monopoly on the issuance and control of money - more persistent. The end result is that the cause and root of all monetary catastrophes - government monopoly of money issuance and control - will become more entrenched. If these countries are indeed not prepared to adopt the more limited proposals presented above, it is logically more difficult for them to accept a common European currency. The idea of completely stripping governments of their monetary monopoly is indeed a bit too abrupt, and most people would even be a bit alarmed if it were to be adopted in the near future. However, as long as the currencies issued by national governments are allowed to compete to please the public from the beginning, the advantages of such a scheme will gradually be understood.

*如对本刊内容感兴趣,请向朋友分享本页面,内容出现更新时,系统将会更准确地匹配显示

微博|知乎|简书  同步更新

查看全文 ➡️ WeComment.ORG

请关注本刊备份号以免失联